Commonly expressed opinions, both lay and professional, have implied that CSA possesses four basic properties:
Qualitative and quantitative literature reviews of CSA have offered mixed conclusions regarding these properties but have suffered from various shortcomings.
Problems in qualitative reviews have generally included
Quantitative reviews have included
These reviews, however, have offered less clarification regarding issues of
To address the shortcomings of the qualitative and quantitative reviews, we reviewed the CSA literature based on college samples. The advantages of this literature were
Review of the college samples revealed that 14% of college men and 27% of college women reported events classifiable as CSA, according to the various definitions used.
Results from the college data do not support the commonly assumed view that CSA possesses the four basic properties outlined previously.CSA was associated with poorer psychological adjustment across the college samples, but the magnitude of this association (i.e., its intensity) was small, with CSA explaining less than 1% of the adjustment variance.
Further, this small association could not be attributed to CSA for several reasons:
These results imply that, in the college population, CSA does not produce pervasive and intensely negative effects regardless of gender.
Therefore, the commonly assumed view that CSA possesses basic properties regardless of population of interest is not supported.
It is important to add that analysis at the population level estimates the typical case and therefore obscures individual cases. That is, the findings of the current review should not be construed to imply that CSA never causes intense harm for men or women - clinical research has well documented that in specific cases it can. What the findings do imply is that the negative potential of CSA for most individuals who have experienced it has been overstated.
The validity of using studies based on the college population to assess characteristics of CSA in the general population is of particular concern.
Objections to such an approach have included claims that SA college students
(e.g., Briere, 1988 ; Jumper, 1995 ; Pallotta, 1992 ).
Evidence from the current review of similarities in CSA between the college and general populations, however, contradicts these views. Compared with SA persons in national samples, SA college students experienced intercourse, close family CSA, and multiple incidents of CSA just as often, and the overall prevalence of CSA was not lower in the college samples.
The magnitudes of CSA-adjustment relations in the college samples and in
the national samples meta-analyzed by Rind and Tromovitch (1997) were
Against claims that college students may be too young for symptoms to manifest, Neumann et al. (1996) found that persons under 30 years of age and over 30 years of age did not differ in CSA-adjustment relations, and age also failed to moderate CSA-adjustment relations in the current review.
These results demonstrate the relevance of college data to CSA in the broader population and point to the value of using the college data to evaluate the commonly assumed properties of causality, pervasiveness, intensity, and gender equivalence. [*5]